hai all...
"neurotransmitters, hormones and other chemicals of brain and body matter a lot in the perception of love...i.e type, extent of love etc which makes the love behaviours at that time"
"nature has produced all of us with more appetite for love...yes...every one can love many people to the same extent with or without sexual element in it...but the issue is 'possessiveness'...one might say 'i love all these people, romantically too...but i don't like them being romantic with any one else!'...there comes the problem!...and possessiveness is so strong like id that it can lead to legal issues.
when a person is full of happiness, he or she radiates love...there are some who are always happy...not bothered about anything on earth...but they do fullfil their responsibilities at home and with relationships...they perceive only positive in everything and with every one and in every life event...so they are happy and people around them are happy...such people are loved by all...can they love all?...even if they love two or three out of this all, what will happen?...the possessiveness will come and separate all...so 'radiating' people eventually become 'radiationless' people!"
"Love is a word that is overused and misused till it means nothing at all. If you think about it, there are Eskimos who have 200 different words for what we simply call "snow" because it is so important in their lives for so many different purposes. We have one word for love. We love our mothers, our lovers, our children, our friends, our country, God, the beautiful sunset last night, the dress Susan was wearing yesterday, and the book we read last week. There is no way we feel the same way about our mothers and our lovers, let alone all those other things. And this doesn't even get into questions of quality or quantity. If love is really important to us, than we need new words to describe it more accurately"
on the above posts there was a post from a specialist...now read that...
"I do not believe it's about "possessiveness", and also I do not believe the right amount of "possessiveness" is a bad thing.
It just answers to a super-basic instinct. The purpose of a couple, in Nature, isn't "love", you know...
But in a human couple, "dedication" is a fundamental part of Love relationships.
Never seen a "open relationship" REALLY work.
In other words. If we think of "love" as the unconditioned acceptance of alla and every behavior, characteristic, act and so on of somebody else, we're talking friendship, maybe.
But as a relationship is involved, Love takes a series of characteristics that allow that relationship to endure.
Otherwise, we're in the "friendship with benefits" field, in which there's no tie and no bond and no real commitment.
We're in a wild pack again, and the only thing that matters is to be free.
But again, in Nature nobody is "free".
There's been that beautiful research on "animal ethics", which stated that "animals are ethic because they can't afford not to be".
We're so "against" ties and bonds and rules, but have we stopped and stepped aside to see what those ties and bonds and rules exist for?
Everything has a purpose, and nothing is done randomly at hazard, in Nature..."
i hope it is not confusing and something is fructifying in your mind regarding love...ok guys...bye...see you...
if you notice here...some are talking about love which is felt by all in common...some are talking about their personal experiences and opinions...
rams
"neurotransmitters, hormones and other chemicals of brain and body matter a lot in the perception of love...i.e type, extent of love etc which makes the love behaviours at that time"
"nature has produced all of us with more appetite for love...yes...every one can love many people to the same extent with or without sexual element in it...but the issue is 'possessiveness'...one might say 'i love all these people, romantically too...but i don't like them being romantic with any one else!'...there comes the problem!...and possessiveness is so strong like id that it can lead to legal issues.
when a person is full of happiness, he or she radiates love...there are some who are always happy...not bothered about anything on earth...but they do fullfil their responsibilities at home and with relationships...they perceive only positive in everything and with every one and in every life event...so they are happy and people around them are happy...such people are loved by all...can they love all?...even if they love two or three out of this all, what will happen?...the possessiveness will come and separate all...so 'radiating' people eventually become 'radiationless' people!"
"Love is a word that is overused and misused till it means nothing at all. If you think about it, there are Eskimos who have 200 different words for what we simply call "snow" because it is so important in their lives for so many different purposes. We have one word for love. We love our mothers, our lovers, our children, our friends, our country, God, the beautiful sunset last night, the dress Susan was wearing yesterday, and the book we read last week. There is no way we feel the same way about our mothers and our lovers, let alone all those other things. And this doesn't even get into questions of quality or quantity. If love is really important to us, than we need new words to describe it more accurately"
on the above posts there was a post from a specialist...now read that...
"I do not believe it's about "possessiveness", and also I do not believe the right amount of "possessiveness" is a bad thing.
It just answers to a super-basic instinct. The purpose of a couple, in Nature, isn't "love", you know...
But in a human couple, "dedication" is a fundamental part of Love relationships.
Never seen a "open relationship" REALLY work.
In other words. If we think of "love" as the unconditioned acceptance of alla and every behavior, characteristic, act and so on of somebody else, we're talking friendship, maybe.
But as a relationship is involved, Love takes a series of characteristics that allow that relationship to endure.
Otherwise, we're in the "friendship with benefits" field, in which there's no tie and no bond and no real commitment.
We're in a wild pack again, and the only thing that matters is to be free.
But again, in Nature nobody is "free".
There's been that beautiful research on "animal ethics", which stated that "animals are ethic because they can't afford not to be".
We're so "against" ties and bonds and rules, but have we stopped and stepped aside to see what those ties and bonds and rules exist for?
Everything has a purpose, and nothing is done randomly at hazard, in Nature..."
i hope it is not confusing and something is fructifying in your mind regarding love...ok guys...bye...see you...
if you notice here...some are talking about love which is felt by all in common...some are talking about their personal experiences and opinions...
rams
No comments:
Post a Comment