Tuesday 31 December 2013

where is the present culture going?

Hai all...hope you read the post on being religious and being spiritual....

the present society is moving towards being spiritual...but the oldies tell all the religious stories and tie them on the old rotten stuff...make their life miserable. 

we think that the culture, ie way of living...i.e what we think, what we do, our attitudes, beliefs and perceptions etc is defined inside the house...it is wrong. The Technology decides the culture. The developments in science and technology dictate the culture. If you close your eyes for a while and delete all that you see around you and outside, you will be standing amidst a jungle...so all that vanished are the ones we created...the developments in science and technology created them...comforts of living...so, they decide how we live...our culture! e.g mobiles, television, movies, computers, anything you name it!

so, 

1. culture is not in our hands. It is a part of evolution.
2. society is moving towards spiritual and we have no control on that.
3. being spiritual gives a peaceful, happy, healthy and successful life than being religious
4. More than IQ, one needs more of EQ and SQ to reach the top positions in organisations

more later...

spiritually yours
rams-psychologist and sociologist

how to find out who we are?

hai all those who go to temples and mutts for peace!

1. take a paper and pen. Draw three tabular columns. 
2. 'What are the characteristics or personality traits of a good human being?'...write the answer for this question in the first tabular column.
3. Now write your characteristics against each of them in the next column.
4. If you have a true friend who can boldly tell you all about you, ask him to write in the third column about you, against those characteristics.
5. Compare all the three column.
6. You will know who you are and where we have to correct the traits and where we have to grow our traits....to be a good human being.

once you are a good human being, then peace will prevail, as ...as....as...peace can come only to good human beings.

spiritually and peacefully yours
rams-psychologist and sociologist

who is responsible for the increase in old age homes in india?

regarding the increase in the number of 'old age homes' in our country...and every one blaming the children saying 'they are ruthless, they don't have responsible or love or faithful feeling to their parents'...

1. once the parents of a guy living in mumbai visited...they travelled all the way from kanyakumari for two days and nights in second class train (those days konkan railway was not there)...they reached the home after changing buses at 11 am...the guy had gone to office...his wife opened the door and came...when she saw her in-laws, she shut the door and went in and shouted 'get lost! don't enter my house!'...those days there was no mobile...so they waited here and there in the colony...the guy came in the evening...met the parents...took them home...the wife refused to open the door inspite of all the requests etc...as there was no other way, the guy took them back to the railway station and sent them back in unreserved...can you imagine two oldies travelling for days and nights in unreserved second class train from bombay to kanyakumari?

i am sure you must be boiling against that lady who did not allow them inside the house!!!....at the same time why don't you think about the lady's side 'what made her to behave like this?'...'what the oldies did to her to make her get so angry and behave inhuman?'...(the lady looks after her husband and children soooo well and she has a good name around as a good wife and nice mother)...i am sure they must have treated her very badly some time...

boys are generally attached to their mother soooo much, they just love them a lot!...but if they are pushed to such levels of keeping them safe and sound in old age homes, then it must certainly be due to the parents...

1. interfering in the internal affairs of the boy and girl
2. directing them and controlling them
3. expecting them to live a life dictated by them
4. the girl is treated just as a servant girl
5. never allow any intimacy to bloom in between the two
6. mothers get attached to their sons so much that they feel possessive and do not like any other girl coming in between and snatching away his love, time, emotions, attention, money and all the resources from her
7. interfering in the rearing of the children (this is one no mother likes. The mother wants to rear the children as per his wish and when the m in law interferes in this, she does not like it)
8. they demand so much right of their son and authority in running the affairs at home
9. they treat the girl in humanly and insult her and her family members.

obviously they will be thrown in old age homes...

so, guys and girls in middle age, let us pull up our socks and behave better with our daughter-in-laws and our sons.

rams

7 points to groom a happy and peaceful children

hai all...what are the personality traits that are required for the children of any day to live happily and peacefully while being successful in life?

1. ability to travel to any place on earth, live there, adapt to any place on earth, people from any country, religion, language, customs and traditions 

2. ability to eat any food that is available at any place in the world, to cook all that one wants with stuff that is available at that place at that time

3. not to emotionally get attached to all people on earth including the parents, siblings, relatives, friends etc...and language, caste, places, people, items etc

4. not expecting from any one, any place and any item and not being possessive...of any one and anything...

5. ability to love nature, all products of nature and be happy, peaceful and healthy at any place, with any one, with any thing

6. be like mother Teresa helping any one and every one and being kind and loving with all and everything...and happy and rocking like the Shah Rukh Khan characters in movies...always bubbly bubbly spreading happiness, smiles and energy...

7. being positive and perceiving only positives from every one and everything...

we must be adopting many techniques of grooming our children...telling them about life, living...asking them to follow certain behaviours in life...

as long as it gives all these 7 points above all that you want will happen...if it does not give these points, then there can be something missing in your grooming which can affect the child in one way or the other in his life...

keep rocking

peacefully yours
rams-psychologist and sociologist

we do everything fast...including the match making for marriages.

hai all...there are soooo many issues about which things can be typed here...but there is no time...

yesterday i met a father (works at south africa) of a girl who said 'i have come on one month leave from south africa to get my daughter married off!'...i asked him 'have you found out who is that guy?'...he said he has to start the search now and was confident that he can do it!...THE GUY WITH WHOM SHE HAS TO SHARE EVERYTHING OF HER LIFE AND LIVE 'THE ONLY LIFE'...REPEAT 'THE ONLY LIFE' SHE HAS GOT, AS GOD'S GIFT, with a guy who will be decided by her father in just...just...one month!...it sounded as if he is going to buy some commodity...like land...or house...by paying money...

i am sure he will find a guy and some how brain wash the girl and make her get married!...so that he can feel 'woffff! a big burden is off from head!!' and he will go back to south africa happily!

i have heard and seen many guys who come on leave....search for a girl...and get married too, and take that girl along with him when he goes back after leave!!!....what a miraculous indian guys!...and there are soooo many who say 'i am not getting a matching girl for my boy!' or 'i am not getting a good match for my daughter!' for many many years!

all the best girl!...wherever you are and who ever you are!...and a big shabhash to the father from south africa!!

rams

all about 'izzat'or 'self pride'..or 'vekkam maanam rosham'

hai all...

'dei, unakku vekkam maanam rosham soodu soranai irukkaadaaa! uppu pottu thaan thingariyaaa!'

this is a common sentence spoken by any tamilian often...i don't know how to translate it...i think it means simply 'izzat' (self pride?) of a person...

this is the sentence which makes people 

1. to get angry
2. to commit many murders
3. to feel revenge and indulge in anger, jealousy and all negative and destructive behaviours
4. to strain their relationships with people
5. to develop enemity with close relatives, sibblings, friends and neighbours
6. to make their children also to develop all the negatives above

this sentence normally causes lots of physiological changes inside the body, volcanic processes inside the mind...it makes us to indulge in provoking behaviors which turns the other person in to an animal, get angry and come with all the force to destroy us!

our culture teaches those destructive behaviours as the response to the above sentence...and above sentence is used by others on us or used by our own mind on us, when we are

1. cheated (may be only a perception) by others
2. insulted by others
3. challenged by others for our caliber in any field of life or issue of life

the real 'vekkam maanam rosham soodu soranai' or 'izzat' we will have only when we show physical and mental behaviours which will make the other person TO CHANGE, MAKE HIM THINK ABOUT HIS ACT AND FEEL BAD OR FEEL GUILTY, correct him and make him to do a positive act as a good changed new human being.

other wise this 'vekkam maanam rosham soodu soranai' will only destroy the happiness, peace, physical, mental and social health of both the people concerned!

So, shall we get ready to screw up our lives with this 'izzat'????

peacefully yours
rams-psychologist and sociologist

what is a punishment?...how it should be designed?

hai all...when we are alone living in a jungle then what ever we do is all right...when we live a social life within social systems like home, organisations, societies, groups and teams etc we are supposed to follow the rules, norms or regulations of the social system...these rules etc are only regulations set by those in that social system so that the people who are different due to their back grounds exhibit common behaviour to achieve the collective goals of all...

so, whenever some one commits some behaviour that is deviant or beyond the tolerable limits then it is considered as a 'wrong behaviour'. 

When people commit such mistakes, or crimes or illegal or unlawful acts they are punished...

most of the punishments that we have formed are to make the person to suffer, others to see him suffering...so that the individual does not repeat the wrong and the punishment is a good deterrent for others so that they are scared to do that wrong...

in our 'revenge mentality' culture the individual gets angry of his punishment, commits the same or different wrongs again...e.g rapes, murder etc...

most of the wrongs are committed by our people when in anger or drunk...during these conditions the cognition part is switched off by the brain...so, we can not think...so, the fear of punishments do not come up in the mind...so, punishments are no deterrents...this is obvious from the repetition of same wrongs by people in the same social system...

in an organisational context, when we punish a person to 'suffer', the individual changes his 'attitude' which is the worst thing that can happen.

In our culture, the way we are brought up, we never accept mistakes as ours (see the above post)...we always attribute the blames to others...'all failures and wrongs are due to others and all the rights and successes are due to us and due to our hard work'...this is how we are groomed...funny people!...so, obviously we are not honest and this leads to many wrong behaviours by us. So, when we are punished in organisations we think we are not at wrong or fault or at mistake and we are punished wrongly, due to vengeance, partiality etc etc.

Under these conditions the individual feels 'i am not at fault. I have been punished in-correctly, illegally. So, i will not work here after. Or i will work only with my own pace. Let you do what ever you want'....or 'you punished me!!! (anger)...i will do the needful to ensure that you suffer the worst man!...just watch out!!'...in the first case the person changes his attitude and stops working or works with less efficiency compared to earlier...in the later case he takes revenge on the person who punished him or the person responsible for the punishment...

in both the cases the organisation is the loser...the individual is the loser...

these things also lead to smaller or bigger conflicts which wastes the resources like working time and time to resolve conflicts....

So, our punishments are only destructive to the person, to the organisation and to others...including the person responsible for punishment and the one punishes...all suffer physically and mentally and their efficiency also reduces...no peace!!!

Punishments are to be meant for 'change'. The individual should realise that he has done some thing wrong, he has to accept his mistake, has to understand that he has to correct for his own good and for common good...and has to select his own punishment too...so that he punishes himself for a change...and he changes...this requires less effort, results in good for all...

today i had to handle a case like this...the usual punishment promulgated by the organisation is destructive...instead i used this technique which i normally use in all such cases...initially the guy argued that he is not wrong...but after 'discussions' (not shouting or finding faults) he realised and accepted his mistake...selected his own punishment...and went off with a smiling face...so, he is changed and no one is affected now. There was no anger, shouting in the entire process...when he executes the punishment others will come to know that 'this person has committed something wrong and he has punished himself'...the individual also will not feel small but walk with pride saying 'yes, i have committed something wrong, it is wrong, i should not have done that, so, i have punished myself!'

of course, punishments are essential as otherwise every one will think 'we can do wrongs and there is no punishments...so, nothing wrong in doing wrongs!'...

keep rocking guys and gals!

peacefully yours
rams-psychologist and sociologist

THE GREAT CULTURE of ours - teaching how to attribute our mistakes on others!

hai all...our mothers are great!...the first time when the infant cries (at the age of five months or so when the infant starts understanding the surroundings and people) the mother says 'who beat my darling! oh baby, don't cry! Is it your father?...don't worry...we will beat him!' she will say this pointing to her husband and beat him too. The father cries and every one laughs including the child. This we do it as a fun. This is done by all in our culture. Later when the child grows, if we ask 'why are you crying my child?', it will look around and show some one...the truth is that person may not be the reason for the crying...basically the child has learnt that 'when i am disturbed it is not me at fault, it is others!'...'when i do something wrong, i should cry, and when people ask what happened or who did it, we have to point out others, i am never wrong or at fault'...

when we hit a stone while walking and it bleeds, we say 'the stone has hit!'...when we hit the 'nilavu' while entering a house, we say 'nilavu adichhiruchhu!'...so, we don't leave even the inanimates!!!

so, the child grows in to a grown up person with all these qualities...not accepting the mistake...'all others are wrong and i am always right'...arguing that he or she is right...pointing the wrongs to others...saying others also are doing the same wrong...erasing or destroying the evidences of our wrong doings...being dishonest...being not true...telling lies...doing a chain of wrongs...making others also a party to all the lies to make sure that he or she is not punished...so, our great culture had produced, is successfully producing and will continue to produce such dishonest people. Honesty in simple things is a big thing. If this is there in a person, that person will automatically have 'honesty in big things is a noble thing'...

there are some people who don't take any decisions in organisations due to fear of going wrong and he getting the blame...so, they always maneuver in such a way that the decision is taken by others and the attributability of blame does not come to them... 

how many of our children or how many of us have the courage to get up or raise our hands and say that 'it is my mistake! I have done that wrong! It is my decision error!' before we are asked by people around?

Claps to our great parents who taught us this great culture!

peacefully yours
rams-psychologist and sociologist

Tuesday 24 December 2013

what is love - 31

hai all....some more views...of others....


"THAT is exactly why I said "...and keep checking along the way". :-)
There are ALWAYS signs showing incongruities and inconsistencies and allowing one to see WHO his/her partner really is. Of course, we usually "chose" not to see them... but they're there, and our UNconscious notices them all the time.
The cap off the shower gel bottle? AAAARRRRRGHHHHHHHHH! NOOOOOOOOOOO! I mean.... Who cares?

 PS: What is a "shower gel bottle"? Or should I ask what a shower is, first?"



"We can't love others higher than how much we love ourselves. We can love ourselves as long as we don't sacrifice others. The tragedy is when a person love others and sacrificing oneself UNCONSCIOUSLY. The greatest love of all is when a person can love self and others and sacrifice oneself consciously. I don't know how many of us reach this level.
THis is pure opinion not absolute.."


"I couldn't agree more. Buddha and those who has reached enlightened continue to meditate after enlightenment. Bliss or happiness is pretty useless if we can't "go back" to it. Like there is a story by Anthony de Mello "Enlightened happens in 1 second" the teacher said. THe students asked "So, why do we practice day and night?" The teacher said,"to make sure you are awake when it happens."

I don't know if we are speaking about the same thing. I just have a strong positive reaction reading your post."



"The students asked "So, why do we practice day and night?" The teacher said,"to make sure you are awake when it happens."

Yes, I believe we are speaking about the same thing. We get an insight, an aha, a feeling of deep inner joy, and a "sensation" of enlightenment. Then, without realizing it, we may loose the feeling of it, but "think" we are still in it. However, unless we tune into our body "to make sure we are awake," and feel the clarity and essence, we may not even be aware that we're not coming from that awareness and state of love and wisdom -- the reason for "practicing day and night and sometimes in between"



"As far as the comment, "love is a choice," I agree with that. But how do we choose - through the head, heart or gut?

I have come to believe that we choose partners, more often than not, because of a magnetism that we interpret as love. That magnetism is often based on impulses in our bodies that we lived with as children - when we "felt" loved - or at least got attention and felt cared for. That feeling could have come from a parent who gave attention by badgering, demeaning, or yelling, and even abusing. Unconsciously we choose a partner with that same energy and go into the same attachment mode and behavior patterns as in childhood. We try to change that person to help us feel loved. When that doesn't happen - look out. That's when we judge, criticize and demean. But we must remember what we judge in another is something that is unresolved within ourselves. When we resolve our own issues, there is love, pure unadulterated love.

The real challenge is to break from this old umbilical cord and open to our own connection of the deep love within ourselves and be able to be in a relationship coming from love – rather than magnetism."


"I find it odd that the question is a very common one and it is very clear, but we are not answering the question, bu instead making our own agendas,and opinion known, about what we think we want to say about love. Bottom line there is no rhyme nor reason unless you go biological, and even there, it's a mystery. Love is allusive. Like air it is, and mst need it and want it"




"I'd say that if the question is so very common it's because nobody has a clear answer...

  you just described how couple relationships usually start. Now, is it love? I don't know. Is that what people calls love? Yes, at least ONE of the things people call love. :-)

To me, your description contains the answer... That is not "love", but an attempt at "feel loved".

What I found about that is that either it's an attempt to "recover the felling of being loved", as you said (which, BTW, is wrong, because we were then loved by our PARENTS, and even if it was "good love" it wasn't the same "love" you build a marital relationship around... hopefully), or it's an attempt to "correct" a LACK of "feeling loved" by one of the parents (so we try to get loved by someone with the same characteristics and relationship dynamics, and end up being as abused and non-loved as we had been the first time...), or again it's a way to feel loveable... Like "If s/he loves me, than I'm lovable". Let's say it's a way to love oneself THROUGH someone else's love...

There may be more nuances, but "structurally" these are the main three cases I found. All of these cases show how "love" is intended to fill a void in one's affective "self", or life, so to say.

Now, if one REALLY, truly loves oneself in the first place, it may be a "love" in which one does NOT "need" the other one's love to fill a void, as there's no void in him/her: the void that was has been filled from inside...

 And in this last case, the choice comes from the "whole" of the person: head, heart and gut. Whatever they are."



"Yes, that is where we need to be...love of self with no need to be loved. But the need remains to love, because that is how we stay healthy biologically, mentally and most of all, spiritually."


"you're right. We need to love. And maybe this "unconditional love" stuff was made up to fulfill that need, so that we can "love everything" without having to assume responsibility for a close, lasting relationship (I admit I sometime have this feeling about the "unconditional love" issue... Then I just shake the idea away and put the issue in the "unresolved" drawer again.

This makes me remember a elder woman in Tonga. She said to me once: "Humans are not meant to be alone. And when we get old, we need a reliable person at our side, someone who can take care of us and of whom we may take care. Someone of heart".

I think this shows how the needs in a love relationship vary in time, yet there's always that "caring" thing as foundation.."



"I am beginning to think, in my older age, that relationships are beds of karma...they are for learning about love, fear, guilt, etc. and sometimes we even find a teacher that appears to be our adversary or difficult to live with or communicate with or work for etc. ...but is there to teach us to accept...forgive...walk away of necessary, but not to get enmeshed with adversity and to love unconditionally. Otherwise, most of human love is conditional, I am sad to say. I love someone that I keep close to me because of how I describe that person or relative which is usually conditional"



"I think many who meet up, and marry successfully have interests in common, or have met in an environment where they shared those interests, studies, pursuits. I see this in a few of my young relatives. They were both in the same class at university, knew each other for years, and some time after graduation, got married, work in much the same field.
I definitely think "love" should not be acquired out of neediness, or because one wants someone to look after one. And "love" should not be sought with desperation, as in "better anyone at all than being alone".


"As I stated above, children often feel loved when they are given attention, even if it's negative attention. That being said, I believe we attract mates with energy similar primarily to the parent we have unresolved issues with and hope to change them. The mate might act and speak totally differently - even opposite, but the energetic vibrations are the same. And we try to change them to get them to love us -- or at least help us feel loved. The only way we can do that is to learn to "receive" love from our Higher Self.

I have come to believe that every person in our lives, with whom we have an emotional charge, is here to teach us something about ourselves and our openness (or closedness) to our Higher Selves. Whatever we criticize in another is something we still need to resolve within ourselves. When we resolve it, we are more open to receive our own Divine love and therefore can accept another's idiosyncracies about that issue and although he or she may still repeat the same behavior it won't bother us any more. That's when we're in a state of unconditional love"


"To me love has nothing to do with having the same interests, studies or pursuits - although that might be what attracts people to each other. However, I know a lot of couples who have these same interests but still aren't close to each other and don't experience that deeper level of love, To me deep love in a couples relationship ensues when there are no judgments, criticisms or demeaning accusations. And it means having the ability to keep our hearts open and "receive" each others love. It's when two souls merge that we have the feeling of connection and being "in love."



"Why would anyone want to change anyone, I ask! It is not a good idea to marry someone to change him or her, and anyone who gets married to someone for that purpose will quickly find out that they are on the wrong tack. L. And who doesn-t have little foibles or peculiarities. Things are often simpler than they seem. Turning the good old blind eye now and then is a commonsense approach.

And yes,  there are a lot of lonely folks who are married. That"s probably because they married someone in order not to feel lonely or alone, or they married for a host of other wrong reasons.
Amazing how people will think through a contract, any contract, financial etc. but never give a thought to the marriage contract"


"Well, that"s your opinion, Penny. I don"t agree.
It is not uncommon for people to meet in the venue where they study, or are engaged in work etc. Maybe some do meet on cloud nine, but that is hardly a good basis for a future long partnership!
. It is most constructive to have the same interests, or at least some of the same interests as one"s spouse. And also for each spouse to have other interests.

I think this is stating the obvious>

"To me deep love in a couples relationship ensues when there are no judgments, criticisms or demeaning accusations".

Equally I can tell you that any couple who tells you they never have a little tiff or quarrel are lying"



"I think many people do give thought to a marriage contract -- but they don't know what to think about it or what they need to do to keep their end of the bargain. Morton Hunt, a marriage researcher in the 1970's said, "A good marriage is mutual psychotherapy." I think of it as being coaches for each other - which means helping each other feel loved within themselves and reach their highest potential. That takes listening, validating, empathizing and sharing the love - and having a good loving sex life helps as well."


"my husband of 35 years and I have almost no interests that are the same. The first night I met him I wrote a little ditty and it hasn't changed much:

We don't have the same interests,
He likes fishing and golf.
I like sailing and tennis.
He likes poker and football.
I like dancing and shows.
Why should I see him again?
Because!

Because we shared the same values and have a deep glue of love and respect that keeps our love glowing, growing, and flowing. And that is bliss!"


"I definitely think "love" should not be acquired out of neediness, or because one wants someone to look after one. And "love" should not be sought with desperation, as in "better anyone at all than being alone".": agreed on that, Yet, to love is something that could be defined as a "need". But again, these are just words, and there are so many level of "need" and so many ways of being "in need"...

"The mate might act and speak totally differently - even opposite, but the energetic vibrations are the same.":  this is just another way of saying the very same thing I said: "we try to get loved by someone with the same characteristics and relationship dynamics, and end up being as abused and non-loved as we had been the first time".

And, yes, I totally agree with your statement: any couple who tells you they never have a little tiff or quarrel are lying."

ok guys...more views of others, later!

rams


WHAT IS LOVE? - 30

hai all...some more views of others....

"I'm not saying people should do "all and everything" together. But for me each one should be entitled to get in whenever s/he likes to and in whatever s/he likes to, with no possible exceptions.

 If you don't ASK for privacy, you'll sure get it.

 If you ask for it, it implies you're hiding something that I shouldn't see. And THIS is as unhealthy as "living in each other's pocket"...

And... Yes, "perfect" do exist. Almost. Within a tolerance range. ;-) And yes, there are mistakes one simply cannot make. You know that short story about the broken plate and the apologies, I assume... or the other one about a mother driving a nail in the wall for every misbehavior of her son and then explaining him what it is.

 "Irreproachable" is absolutely easy for me to find.

But yes, each to his/her own. My experience is different than yours... APPARENTLY. I would bet that if we were to TALK about it around a campfire it wouldn't be THAT different. It's the problems with words."



"So many welcome perspectives illuminating so much! Our shared interest shows how universal and utterly human it is. I hesitate to add any more perspectives, most have already been introduced. As Erich Fromm, said years ago..

" There is hardly any word which is more ambiguous and confusing than the word "love." It is used to denote almost every feeling short of hate and disgust. It comprises everything from the love for ice cream to the love for a symphony, from mild sympathy to the most intense feeling of closeness. People feel they love if they have "fallen for" somebody. They call their dependence love, and their possessiveness too. They believe, in fact, that nothing is easier than to love, that the difficulty lies in finding the right object, and that their failure to find happiness in love is due to their bad luck in not finding the right partner. But contrary to all this confused and wishful thinking, love is a very specific feeling; and while every human being has a capacity for love, its realization is one of the most difficult achievements. (in Man for Himself, 1947, p. 13)"


"You are correct that many people become addicted to the pleasurable effects of falling in love. I know of quite a few men and women who are quite open about their desires to fall in love again and again.

Unfortunately they continue doing it with other people and not their respective partners. I believe that whilst the decrease in serotonin is usually associated with the onset of depression (this can also be a factor in our desire to seek out new loves to offset the depressive side of our nature) it is offset by the increase in dopamine. Dopamine can also be produced in the brain in other ways and not just be "falling in love" or artificially but also by the simple act of smiling.

Smiling either because we are happy or because we want to be happy will "trick" the brain into releasing both dopamine and also serotonin and we will feel much better about everything in our life. Smiling is truly contagious not only for our brain and body but it can have a positive impact on our attitudes and on the lives of those around us. It is a wonderful free drug and the more we do it then the easier it becomes."




"I agree...love is perceived differently by men and women...by children and adults...in india and US...two different communities or religions etc...like this if we look at every angle 'every individual' perceives this damn thing (LOL) differently...that is how it draws the attention of every one, plays a key role in our lives...and worth discussing...not just by few...by people of all places, religions, genders (we have not heard from homosexuals and transgenders yet!!), ages etc...so that we come out of our wells!

  good points on unconditional love...between couples there can be some secrecies...not with respect to their relationships (with or without emotion) with others...but on other issues...e.g "I don't want to tell my wife about the help I did to that person as she can not take it in the right spirit!"...like this there can be many...it might involve people or not...

  your discussions clearly bring out the difference in experiences...yes...some need some space in some aspects...e.g husband may not like his wife's some of the activities on social networks...he might perceive it to be harmful...but she might not perceive it so...so, she might demand that space...some keep their passwords for their email ids, websites etc to themselves...not because they hide something...just because they feel it is their personal, and that is how it is...some people in love do not like to share certain things with their lovers or spouse...hmmm...we have all types of differences!


I strongly feel everything happens inside the brain...all behaviours originate from there...all differences originate from there...of course, the social systems and related group behaviors, cultures etc also have their impact in learning and changing or creating new behaviours, beliefs, perceptions etc...but I want to know more inside the brain as that is what is not visible outside or not known to many...the other social element is visible, experienced and discussed widely in books...so, I like your points!...obviously, such thirst never gets quenched...so would wait for more!..LOL!"


"This is a brave endeavor to introduce a deep and abstract topic in the field of psychology. You have my admiration. I am going to try to share my thoughts from psychological point of view. Attachment is an important factor in interpersonal relationship.

Bowlby identified 3 kinds of childhood attachment to caregiver that seems to affect the child's future relationship: secure, insecure, and no attachment. Love as Attachment is probably the most common form. With attachment, a child experience "stranger" effect and separation anxiety. Due to attachment, we separate strangers, acquaintants, friends, and intimate circle.

Due to attachment, we also experience anxiety, jealousy, possessiveness, and grief. Infatuation and parental love usually have loads of attachment in it. What inconditional love mother don't experience pain when her child experience pain? This is the "hurt" part of love, the thorns of the roses. WHen we are "in love", we experience the high of the heaven and the pain of hell, don't we? We are very possesive, obsessive, and compulsive (my friend's mother told me that she knew when her son was "in love" during adolescent because he would wake up before the sunrise, would do chores without being told to, and was very thoughtful to others.

 Then, there is the sexual attraction part. The Courting and Mating routine that we share with animal world. This is the other factor that create Infatuation. It's physical attraction based. This love is what 99% of love songs talk about, the honeymoon period, the beginning level of relationship.

Another kind of love is what people call Spiritual love, God's love, Mystical love. Realizing the limitation and pain from Attachment, it's a attachment-free love. Why limit oneself with infatuation with one person or one group, why don't we infatuated with the whole world, with life itself, with the universe? This is the love of Buddha, Jesus, Kahlil Gibran or Rumi. Why limit our intoxication with parts of the universe if we can be intoxicated with the whole universe? Leave the attachment, love your children, others, yourself, the whole universe. "We can not love what we are attached to" You must be free first to love freely without getting stuck by your attachment.

Be in love with life itself, get drunk with it, get intoxicated with being "in love" with whoever and whatever.."

"I write this as blindly as I can and without the influence of what has been written before me, for I see that because of the topic there are many opinions, and I would like to give mine without pressure of what has already been said. I believe that love is nothing more that an agreement of one to care for something or someone.

It is a choice and a mental contract, that is independent of all else, but interdependent in most cases of an invisible contract of conditions that are created by our ability to scaffold the psyche of our past experiences. We attempt to associate love to other things, because our minds are not able to fully understand love.

We write what love is like, and what it is not never having a universal definitive language nor definition of what it is. I think that love is elusive and pending on the stage one has arrived in life could determine their ability to illuminate a shadow of what they think they see love to be."




"Although I've mentioned this in other group discussions, it might be appropriate here. It was while going through divorce that I had a mystical experience. (See full article at http://pennycohen.com/Penny/My_Mystical_Experience.html) To make a long story short, after crying hysterically with these animalistic, earth wrenching sounds coming out of me, I laid down in bed. It felt like every bit of my being left my body. In total silence I felt this radiance surround me, like soft pins and needles massaging my skin. Then I felt this incredible warmth and love enter into me. I remembered thinking "This is the feeling of love without having someone to love. This is what unconditional love is. It's love that's received when we're open to it. And it has nothing to do with loving anyone unconditionally." I then thought, "This must be what divine love is."

 



"After many years of researching that experience, I realized that this was a love of opening to my Higher Self. The love within myself within Oneness and it's everlasting when I stay open to it. Again, it has nothing to do with anyone else. However, when two people are open to this love, and receive each others' energies, that's when there's "bliss." To me, that's what being "in love," is all about"


"You have interpreted correctly what I wanted to say. I certainly do not investigate what my husband does online, nor does he bother with my online. But I can well imagine that there are jealous and possessive spouses/partners who would. Then again a marriage or partnership where there is jealousy and possessiveness is not a relationship by a long chalk.
Another aspect is that no adult woman should be looking for a man "to look after her". A husband is not your Dad. There are sad cases.....some time back I was out with a friend of mine, and she said "must drop in for a few moments to see Elizabeth. She was widowed some months back. We"re all trying to give her a hand as never in her life did her late husband allow her to deal with household bills etc. so she doesn't even know where to start with the electricity bills, dealing with repair men, the water company etc...." Can you imagine a spouse infantilizing the "other" to that extent. How selfish!

He isn"t your girlfriend either, and it isn"t his job to listen to the type of brainstorming conversation you might have with one or other of your girlfriends. Watch his eyes glaze over if you start comparing the merits of different brands of underwear, hair products, etc.

Love is "letting go", letting the "other" just be"





"This is such an interesting topic and is fundamental to our very existence. Some years ago I heard the expression "unconditional love" and at the time I thought that this was indeed a description of "true" love but now when I examine it with hindsight I can see that sometimes it does not make sense.

Should I love someone unconditionally who beats me or abuses me? Should I love someone unconditionally with no conditions attached at all such as respect and integrity? Finally after many years I was able to see a different view of "unconditional love" and I believe that it has little to do with other people. There is one person in our lives who we should love without conditions attached and that person is ourselves.

We should learn to love oneself with all the flaws and disappointments about our character and nature and failures in life. We can learn to forgive oneself because we are only human and our journey in life will always be difficult. Yes, indeed when we can love ourselves without any preconditioned or conceived expectations then we are truly developing a deeper understanding of our existence.

Although it may only be brain chemicals essentially we are an organism with many interesting natures and we should investigate ourself deeply"



"I believe we can have unconditional love for an abusive person at a distance. I don't believe love has anything to do with forcing oneself to be close to anyone. Sometimes we need to slip out the back to love unconditionally"



"I believe enlightenment, or that state of everlasting love is not an end result but a daily practice of processing our thoughts, beliefs, feelings, speech and actions to open to receive and share that love. The more we do that the more we stay in that on an ongoing basis."


"your last post is an almost perfect example of what I alluded to as "the problem with words". 

I surely agree with many of your statements. You're using different words now, like in "I certainly do not INVESTIGATE what my husband does online". Who would?

 But if you were to get close while he's online and you'd notice he closes some browser's pages, or turns the computer off, I'd bet you'd notice... AND it'd be some sort of a "signal". Or else, your "complex equivalence" for "marital relationship" is VERY different than mine.

I won't even discuss "jealousy and possessiveness", because they're words that could have literally INFINITE nuances of meaning... as almost any other that's being used in this topic.

 Meanwhile, I TOTALLY agree with the part about "looking after" the partner, just underlining that it goes BOTH ways. There are way too many women treating their partners as if they were babies.

 Yet, "caring" is a basic foundation of "love", at least as I understand it, so that there should be some sort of continuous feedback and adjustment.

What I'm trying to say is that love, especially in a love relationship, is ALSO a COMMUNICATION PROCESS, with continuous "communications and feedbacks" loops. And this is a part of it that is way too overlooked,

  I definitely agree with the concepts in your post. Yet, to me they relate more to a love RELATIONSHIP than to love in itself. What I mean is that your questions, to me, sound more like "Should I start/keep a relationship with someone who beats or abuses me? Should I start, or stay in, a relationship without my highest values (like respect and/or integrity) being fulfilled?". And of course the answer is "No!"...

 And I agree with all the part about unconditionally loving oneself .

  your quotation is IMHO quite good, at least in the first part.

Many posts ago, you stated that "love is a choice". I have to say that I kind of agree. Love in itself maybe is a feeling, a sentiment or whatever that IS present in our self. Yet, to start a love relationship and COMMIT TO IT with all one's being definitely IS a choice, and when there's assumption of responsibility for it (which usually comes from an awareness of it... and of the reasons for it), then the relationship can last and endure storms and survive... it will, at least, match my own values, I mean My two cents again...


"There are women who do baby, or try to baby, their husbands, same as those who baby their adult sons lol.

In Ireland you"ll hear people remark about such a relationship / "she even stirs his tea for him".

Re switching off the browser if I appeared beside him, well, maybe he might be about to order me a fine diamond ring and wants it to be a surprise. But I know what you mean, of course. "Oh horror, maybe he"s chatting that buxom blonde down the road" (she doesn't stand a chance in hell. I am a hard act to follow LOL).


And I agree too about commitment, indeed I am always going on about it. An awful lot of people sail into the marriage (the dress, the flowers, the music, the cake, the jollity) and do not think about what they are really doing.

Caring is indeed a two-way street. Inter-dependence, not co-dependence.

Indeed, here we online have online textual communication, so there will always be room for mis-interpretation. But, hey, we're doing our best...


"I agree, love is a choice. And if we want to love someone...and no one shows up...we can find someone and attribute the things we want...to him/her...and decide to love."


"I really like your sense of humor.

 Though, I wasn't necessarily thinking of "Oh horror, maybe he"s chatting that buxom blonde down the road". Even if he WERE chatting her, it wouldn't mean anything bad just yet... I don't jump to conclusions, usually (unless he had ALREADY chatted that and others buxom blondes up and down the road in a certain way, of course...

 What I'd think would be "Hmmmm. What is he hiding from me? And why?". As many other human beings, I do NOT like secrets (surprises fall in the same category. If you're caught, you'd better say what you're after, like "You'll see in 'n' days". And I won't forget...

 BTW, let me generalize here... MY experience is that women like "surprises" like fine diamond rings. BUT they want to know they'll like it... and their men too, 'cause if they don't it'll mean troubles . So I found out that the best way to do it is to casually walk in front of the jewelry, and when she says "Oh, how lovely that diamond ring is!" you just lead her in and buy it. THAT would be a surprise!..



"That's why I say it should take time to get into a love relationship, and that BOTH are entitled to know the best AND (especially...) the worst of the potential partner. Once you know who you're dealing with, you can make an educated decision... which won't keep you from making mistakes, but hey, we do our best... and keep checking along the way."




"Absolutely! I have always thought that we need to choose to be with the one that has the particular problems we can accept. I actually think most of the time, folks choose a partner who they attribute to them what they want...that person figures out what they want and attempt to even provide that for a while...and that may be why I cry at weddings"



"I just love surprises, and secrets do intrigue me so. heh heh.

I so agree with you that one should be aware of the best, and the worst (I really would prefer no "worsts") before entering a marriage or partnership. Problem is that the career abuser and individuals of that kind make very sure that one is not aware of what they are like, and they can present as the most normal, indeed likeable, people imaginable. They can keep up that "mask of sanity" for a while, until it is too late. So all too often one does NOT know with what one is dealing and therefore a decision can in fact seem like the right one. It's all a bit difficult.....

Leaving that scenario aside, I suppose it depends on what is meant by "problems". Some people go mad if the spouse leaves the cap off the shower gel bottle."


ok guys....more later...

rams

what is love? - 29

hai all...some more views of experts are here...

"Since the Greeks labelled it so long ago, it must be rather obvious that the first two types of love exist. It seems they are such an evident and essential part of life that they were able to identify them early on. However, the third presents a challenge.

As I see it, the first two types of love are instinctual, intrinsic and "compulsory" in the sense that nobody can circumvent them because they are motivated, driven and generated from deep within the psyche and basically unchangeable. No human being can live without being driven to form, or forming these love connections during a lifetime, whether successful or not.

But the third one, the "unconditional love", which I assume must occur sometime during adulthood, is far more elusive. In fact its so elusive that I don't believe most people ever arrive at that stage of maturity. I sounds closest to the love that a parent holds for a child, though not every parent, and not for every child".


"I think unconditional love can be achieved if we learn to accept others as they are. That is not the same as disagreeing, being angry, or disconnecting from those who appear to be obnoxious. As long as we love them. So, is love an action or a state of mind? I think as long as the action is not opposite of love, then love can exist"


"I agree with you: the first two are kind of "biologically based", and there's no way to "escape" from them.

 The third one, "Unconditional love", is tricky. Not because it doesn't exist, but IMHO because it's been labeled as "love".

 BTW, to me "disagreeing, being angry etc." may well be things that happen within a love relationship. This aversion against these feelings, feelings that to me appear to be as natural as the act of breathing, is IMHO wreaking havoc with the lives of many, as it suggests to NOT feel them, implicitly labeling them as "wrong", "bad", "undesirable", "low" and so on, and thus making who feels them (and much worse who EXPRESSES them) the same way.

Emotions are emotions. ALL of them are essential. We're talking "acceptance" here, so please consider accepting emotions that ain't pleasant. Only accepting them, and giving them voice, we can understand the instances that are behind them, and change them if and when they're a problem...
 
However, "unconditional love" is somehow a tricky "concept" to me."


"Answering the question of what is love is like trying to answer " The Chicken and egg question". The answers and experiences are subjective and vary"



"Dr Helen Fisher says...common man or woman says 'love is meeting of hearts and minds'...scientists say 'it is a temporary insanity driven by hormones'!

some classify love into three types....1. lust 2. romance 3. attachment

these three can operate in any order or combination.

some fall in love before sleeping with them.

some get attached deeply and then fall in love.

some have sexual relationship, fall in love and then deeply get attached.

Dr Fisher says "Lust is a craving for sexual gratification, which you can feel for a whole range of people. Those caught up in romantic love focus all their attention on the object of their affection. Not only do they crave them, but they are highly motivated to win them, they obsessively think about them and become extremely sexually possessive. Perhaps illogically, if things go wrong. they are attracted to them even more. During this state the brain is driven by dopamine, a neurotransmitter central to the reward system."

Romantic love is much more powerful than sex drive, says Dr Fisher. And she believes it to be a drive, rather than an emotion. "It doesn't have any facial expression, it's very difficult to control and it's one of the most powerful neural systems that has evolved," she says.

The third brain system is attachment - that sense of calm and security you can feel for a long-term partner. It is associated with the hormones vasopressin and oxytocin, which are probably responsible for the sense of peacefulness and unity felt after having sex. Holding hands also drives up oxytocin levels, as does looking deeply into your loved one's eyes, massage, and simply sitting next to them.

thanks to Dr Fisher"


"While surfing the Net this morning, I stumbled on this "letter of a father to his little girl". Well, to me it shows many things about fatherly love AND marital love. And maybe sheds a bit of light on that elusive "unconditional love" too... :-)

http://drkellyflanagan.com/2013/04/17/a-daddys-letter-to-his-little-girl-about-her-future-husband/"

 
"Love is the very moment -synchronicity- when we are given the gift of "giving and be given" ; love is our personal ladder of evolution, construct, access to "freedom" (no attachment, no expectation, no possession).; love is growing up, it's the experiment of "yin and yang", our scale of inner depth towards ourselves and the others. love is the respect of the individual as unique and different in his wealth as different. A life without love is an ignored death. There is a difference between to be and to exist...There are many "degrees" with/in "love", it is the discovery, mystery of our heart, Soul and our own connection to "universe". Love is making the experience of our-Self, participating to our own "acceptance" of who and what we are ; love is a "state of Being" to tend to "be-come" Human. Love is meeting "our other". Love is an act of identification, an individual commitment. When we say "I love you", "Who" loves ? Love is learning Life."

"I would assert that love is established when two people meet that are on opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of personality, yet both want the same thing in life. One complements the weaknesses and strengths of the other."


"A point to remember is that IMO "love" is perceived differently by men and women.

Moving on to "unconditional" love. Gosh, what an insane idea! As in "s-he beats me over the head every second night, 24&7 s-he belittles, demeans and verbally assaults........but, boo/hoo, I love him/her inconditionally."

In a healthy relationship neither wants to live in the other"s pocket, nor know absolutely everything about the other, nor is one supposed to disgorge every single thought in one"s head. You know something.....a little mystery goes a loooong way."


"on one hand, I agree with your observation about "unconditional love". Yet, on the other hand, I do believe what you said is more about love relationship. It couldn't happen if you love yourself first, either.

Also, I believe your observation confirms my idea that the problem with "unconditional love" is the word "love" in it.

And about the last part of your post... I don't know whether it is or isn't "healthy": I know couples with the strongest relationship that DO know absolutely everything about the other, for example. To me, "privacy" is something for those who have something to hide.

 And mystery is maybe going a loooong way for you, or for women. For me, it goes a long way the opposite direction.

 I'll say it with a metaphor. When I enter a love relationship, it's like I give the keys of my deepest inner house to the other. She's free to get in whenever she likes to, and go exploring wherever she wants to. There are no hidden rooms in there for her. My "house" is her "house".
And viceversa...

 Actually, I could say that my house and her house merge into "OUR house". :-)
I'm not scared of anything I could find. But I believe is one's right to know and find out.

This means I'll trust my partner. Blindly (or almost so). AND I'll feel free to get in unannounced and open whatever door, as I want my partner to do. If I find secrets, a door she won't allow me to see through, that's an issue, and could lead to troubles. If "two ones join together to form a bigger ONE", which is my description of a love relationship, there can be no hidden space between them, nor secrets of ANY kind. Secrets undermine trust, which to me is the main fundament of a love relationship. Of course, this requires on BOTH parts a totally impeccable and irreproachable behavior. In the house there must be NOTHING that the partner could find unappropriated. It looks difficult? It is. But that's the way I see love relationships working. ALL love relationship that I know of that WORK are that way.

Indeed, they're few. But they exist, and they're proof that this way is doable and working.

I remember a lady a few months ago. She was interviewed on TV about her love relationship, and she said: "We do everything together, and are available for the other all the time, and it's fine. It's when you start saying you need your spaces that things are deteriorating". And I somehow agree with her.

BTW... I'd rather leave that "unconditional love" alone, until another word is found to substitute "love" in that expression"


"Well, we shall agree to disagree,  lol. I sure need my space, and equally I can assure you that after 29 years married we are doing OK. I like to meet my friends now and then for a meal or a chat, and I certainly do NOT do absolutely everything with my husband. I don"t haul him along if going for a beauty treatment, for example, or insist he sit in the bathroom while I do certain beauty routines. Maybe there ARE women who do that!

I am NOT talking about secrets, but yes, about privacy, something all humans, married or not are entitled to. Also, I know a fair bit about human nature after quite a few years on this old planet. And of course, everyone is different (just as well I say).

And, so far, we haven't deteriorated lol. Nor have the couples we know, married for a short number of years, some others for decades, who also, from what I see and know, enjoy their little "space". Maybe they are pitching the crockery at each other when no one is around. But, I doubt it. I"ll say it again. Living in each other"s pocket is downright unhealthy.

And yes, there are times when I am "the cat that walks alone". That is how I am, that is how my husband knows me, and he respects that. I don"t tell him (how boring!) all that I dreamt of last night, for example. I don"t repeat verbatim my last chat with a girlfriend, or a list of the clothes I"ve got to buy for next season..

  Perfect does not exist in this world, as in "impeccable" and "irreproachable". There are no saints. I can assure you.

However, each to his or her own. Your way is doable and working, my way and that of others is also doable and working"

ok guys and gals...see you later...

rams

Monday 23 December 2013

what is love - part 28

hai guys and gals...

the view of different experts continues...


"you made me remember a client of mine... He came into the session once and sat in silence for a while. I just waited for him to speak. All of a sudden he lifted his head, watched straight into my eyes and said: "It's easy to say 'thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself'...But what if I just HATE me?". Right on the spot, he was. :-) 
About this stuff of "Love and care for each other as we would wish others to love and care for ourselves", unfortunately it becomes all too often "love and care for others, so somebody else will love and care for you", which, without you loving yourself first, won't work (and will likely lead to some abusive relationship...). 
Thank you everybody for all of your contributions. All of them are, in their own ways, enlightening. "




"How do you know when you’re in love? This is a question I get asked very often. 

Some people may answer that it’s when you want to be with someone for the rest of your life. Or, you adore the person and you want to care for that person forever. True, these are aspects of loving another. But what does it mean to connect with and feel “in love” with another? What’s the difference between loving and being “in love?” 

I had a client who was in what she described as a great committed relationship for about a year. She said it was very close, she truly cared about him, wanted to take care of him and nurture him, but she still wasn’t totally “in love,” with him. Then one day she came in excited to tell me about the shift she experienced. She said she was feeling overwhelmed with buying a new house and moving, having exorbitant expenses and just budgeting her money. She shared this with her boyfriend, who is an accountant. He went with her to help negotiate the mortgage loan, helped her move, and also helped her set up a budget. She said when she thought about how much he did for her she had tremendous love and respect for him. She shared with me that when they made love after closing on her house, “It was the first time that I truly allowed him to love me.” But then she added, “I realized it was the first time I truly opened my heart to him. The passion was incredible.” And then she paused with a sigh, “I allowed myself to be vulnerable.” 

What really happened is she let her defenses down. She allowed his energy to merge with hers. There were no, judgments, criticisms, expectations, boundaries. The two souls merged. That’s when we feel “in love,” and loved.


The most impressionable experience I had regarding “receiving love” was at a workshop I attended many years ago on Unconditional Love. 

There were twelve people taking the workshop including three friends who had come down from Boston together. They were the grossest looking people I’ve ever seen: purple streaks in the woman’s porcupine hairdo, the others in dirty, unkempt clothes, etc. I think you get the picture. Anyway at one point we had to choose a divine quality we wanted to meditate on in groups of three. I chose love. Two of this gruesome threesome chose love. I couldn’t fathom the thought of meditating with them. I told the facilitator. She told me everyone had chosen a quality and that I could sit it out if I wanted to. She reminded me however, that this was a workshop on unconditional love. 

Duh!!! I gave in. 

Upstairs in a bedroom we were instructed to lie down with our heads close together like the hub of a wheel, then we were to meditate on the feeling of love for approximately twenty minutes. When we started the meditation I kept thinking of sending love. About ten minutes into the session, one of the men said to me, “Penny your energy just changed. You have an incredible amount of love coming from you.” I started to ponder what transpired. I realized that the more I relaxed I stopped sending love and was open to receiving the love in the room. He felt my love, not while I was sending, but when I was open to receiving. That’s when a closeness pursued. 

Now the question is how do we maintain this intimacy with our partners in everyday communications. 

To love is to care for each other. To be “in love,” is to have a deep soul, emotional and sensual connection. In order to accomplish this, we have to be open to our own soul; the love within ourselves and be a coach for each other. What emerges when we’re in touch with our own innate love is a deep desire to give rather than get. A way of giving is by valuing another by receiving their words and feeling their energy with them. It happens by listening, validating, empathizing, giving effective inspirational feedback and support. It also involves forgiving from the heart, not just the head and being non-judgmental, non critical, non controlling, and grateful. Staying centered within ourselves and tuning into our partner helps us stay open to our own love, give love to our partner, and in return receive love. It becomes a cycle of receiving love, sharing love, and being “in love.” "




"Dopamine is the chemical that creates the feeling within us because of its effect on the brain. Dopamine increases and serotonin decreases - apparently. We are attracted to someone that is pleasing to our natures and to our various energies and this is what starts the chemical reactions. These reactions are not eternal and sooner or later the passion of love then will fade and sometimes is replaced with companionship and deeper caring for another" 

So our thoughts about someone we meet begin the chemical reaction of dopamine while serotonin decreases (would this not cause some depression?) So as the relationship matures, and a deeper caring appears, what chemical reaction does this set off? Also, do you postulate that the releasing of dopamine chemicals into the brain can cause an increase in dopamine receptors which then can put one at risk to becoming addictive to romantic love?"



"unconditional love is a way of life...who we become."


"Lack of self-love is essentially depression. Can anyone deny the sadness, whether mild or severe, that comes from not liking yourself? 

As I suggested earlier in this discussion, does anybody see the need to distinguish between two types of love: first the infantile love or attachment we all form toward our first love object, a caregiver or parent, a model for love that will follow us throughout life, and second the mature love between two adults that comes later in life and carries with it a sexual component?"




In any case, here's the copy/paste of part of that comment, referring to the "three kind of love":

"There are many different "loves". The love of parents for their sons is different from love for a partner, and both are different from "360° unconditioned love". The Ancient Greeks had three different words for those "loves". There is "philia", which is parents' love (even in a extended, figurated meaning). There's "eros", which involves sex and passion, and is the marital love (and more, but let's stay with the basics here). And there is "agape", which is the unconditional love, given without expecting anything in trade, 360° love, pure and "platonic". Each one of these "loves" implies and involves different relationships."


ok guys and gals...we will continue later...

rams